Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Objectives: Researchers from different fields are increasingly interested in incorporating technology into community-based interventions that promote active aging. Yet, there lacks a comprehensive understanding of technology roles, posing challenges for designers seeking to maximize the intended impacts of such interventions. This systematic review aims to fill the gap by examining existing community-based interventions that integrate digital technologies to promote active aging. Research Design and Methods: Thirteen studies were screened, with a total of 14 interventions examined, following the PRISMA Guideline. Results: The challenges in designing and operating community-based interventions, the roles of technology in the interventions, and the caveats of utilizing technology during the process were identified. The review emphasizes the importance of overcoming challenges in community-based interventions and leveraging technology to enhance the intended impacts. Discussion and Implications: The findings underscore the need to understand technology's nuanced roles in community-based interventions for active aging. The article provides a starting point for accumulating knowledge and practice in utilizing technology to navigate the challenges and opportunities encountered in such interventions. It also sheds light on a notable gap: the lack of innovative and strategic approaches that harness digital interventions appropriately in community-based interventions. This emphasizes a crucial requirement for guidelines to assist designers, policymakers, and community staff in integrating technology appropriately into community-based interventions or implementing interventions that incorporate digital technologies at the community level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: