We present data analysis and X-ray source counts for the first season of-Newton observations in the COSMOS field. The survey covers ~2² within the region of sky bounded by09h57m30s<R.A.<10h03m30s,01deg27'30''<decl.<02deg57'30'' a total net integration time of 504 ks. A maximum likelihood source was performed in the 0.5-2, 2-4.5, and 4.5-10 keV energy, and 1390 pointlike sources were detected in at least one band. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to fully test the-detection method and to derive the sky coverage to be used in the of the logN-logS relations. These relations were then in the 0.5-2, 2-10, and 5-10 keV energy bands, down to flux of 7.2×10⁻¹⁶ ergs cm⁻²⁻¹, 4.0×10⁻¹⁵ ergs cm⁻²⁻¹, and 9.7×10⁻¹⁵ ergs cm⁻²⁻¹, respectively. Thanks to the large number of sources in the COSMOS survey, the logN-logS curves are tightly over a range of fluxes which were poorly covered by previous, especially in the 2-10 and 5-10 keV bands. The 0.5-2 and 2-10 differential logN-logS relations were fitted with a broken power-law which revealed a Euclidean slope at the bright end and a flatter (α~1.5) at faint fluxes. In the 5-10 keV energy band a power law provides an acceptable fit to the observed source with a slope α~2.4. A comparison with the results of surveys shows good agreement in all the energy bands under in the overlapping flux range. We also notice a remarkable between our logN-logS relations and the most recent model of X-ray background. on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States NASA; also based on data collected at the Canada-France-Hawaii operated by the National Research Council of Canada, the National de la Recherche Scientifique de France, and the of Hawaii.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cappelluti et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: