Key result
Rivaroxaban linked to ~3-day shorter hospital stay vs. warfarin in stroke with NVAF.
Why the study?
To compare hospital length of stay between rivaroxaban and warfarin in hospitalized acute stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Japan.
Does initiating Rivaroxaban reduce hospital length of stay in hospitalized acute stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to Warfarin?
Cohort (n=1,850)
Yes
Does initiating Rivaroxaban reduce hospital length of stay in hospitalized acute stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to Warfarin?
In acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF, initiating rivaroxaban rather than warfarin during hospitalization is associated with significantly shorter lengths of stay and reduced initial medical costs.
May support shorter stays in observational data; leaves open whether rivaroxaban reduces LOS versus warfarin in acute NVAF stroke.
Objective To compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) between rivaroxaban and warfarin in hospitalized acute stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Japan.Methods This was a retrospective, observational study using a Japanese hospital claims database. Data of NVAF patients who were started on oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment during hospitalization were extracted and LOS-OAC (period from the initiation of index OAC therapy to the end of hospitalization or censoring date) and medical costs were compared between rivaroxaban and warfarin treatments. To compare LOS-OAC, a time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The analysis period was from April 2012 to December 2015.Results This study included 773 rivaroxaban users and 1077 warfarin users. After the propensity score matching, 546 patients for each treatment constituted the matched cohorts. Although the rivaroxaban users had a similar LOS-OAC to warfarin users (median, 18 vs. 19 days, p = .657) in the matched cohorts, 3 days shorter LOS-OAC was observed in the rivaroxaban users (median, 17 vs. 20 days, p = .043) after IPTW adjustment. Subgroup analysis by the severity of stroke after IPTW adjustment demonstrated that rivaroxaban users had a shorter LOS-OAC than warfarin users among patients with mild (median, 10 vs. 14 days) and moderate stroke severity (22 vs. 27 days), but not among those with severe stroke severity (26 vs. 25 days).Limitations It is not possible to say that the only confounder was stroke severity and therefore other possible known and unknown confounders could not be ruled out.Conclusions The rivaroxaban users had a 3-day shorter LOS-OAC after IPTW-adjustment. Using rivaroxaban was associated with 4–5 days shorter LOS-OAC than using warfarin in patients with mild or moderate stroke, though treatment selection did not have a large impact in patients with severe stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=1,850). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Hospital length of stay from oral anticoagulant initiation (LOS-OAC) (p=0.043). Rivaroxaban users had a 3-day shorter median hospital length of stay compared to warfarin users after IPTW adjustment in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: