This article investigates the simultaneous participation of directors in 320 Brazilian-listed companies in 2001, 2003, and 2005. Our results show that interlocking directorates are a common practice in Brazil. Firm value is, on average, negatively impacted by interlocking directorships, especially in firms in which a majority of directors hold three or more board positions. We also find evidence of a nonlinear relationship between interlocking and return on assets, consistent with the hypothesis that low and moderate levels of this practice may be beneficial to a company, while a high degree of interconnectedness among directors is likely to hurt performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: