Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Memory for narrative materials in learning disabled adults was assessed using stories constructed according to Mandler and Johnson's (1977) story grammar. Experiment I showed that LD adults and normal third graders recalled significantly less than university adults; sixth graders and community college adults were intermediate. The pattern of recall of story nodes, however, did not suggest a structural-organizational deficit in long-term memory, and there were no qualitative differences between the LD group and other groups. In experiment II a repetition group read the stimulus stories three trials successively. A construction group received a brief explanation of the story grammar after which subjects actively constructed the stimulus stories. Contrary to expectations, training in structural analysis did not strengthen the links among individual story elements; the construction group performed as poorly as a standard single-presentation group. Simple repetition, on the other hand, was extremely effective for improving story recall. The results of the two experiments were discussed in the context of proposed short-term memory encoding limitations in learning disabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Worden et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: