Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) affects millions and carries risk for portal hypertension, large varices, and clinical decompensation. The HepQuant DuO® test provides a blood-based assessment of liver function and physiology, generating a disease severity index (DSI) validated for risk stratification. A retrospective, real-world, observational analysis was conducted to evaluate the utility of HepQuant DuO’s DSI cutpoint (18.3) in guiding endoscopy and clinical management decisions for patients with cACLD in the United States. Methods: De-identified data from 87 cases with cACLD were extracted from physician-provided Statements of Medical Necessity documenting the reasons for the HepQuant DuO test. The primary endpoint was concordance of endoscopy decisions with DSI ≤ 18.3 (avoid) or >18.3 (proceed). The secondary endpoint was concordance of clinical management intensity with the same cutpoint. Results: Among the 55 cases analyzed for endoscopy decisions, overall concordance with DSI 18.3 was 93% (p < 0.001 by Fisher’s exact test): 96% of cases with DSI ≤ 18.3 avoided endoscopy, and 90% with DSI > 18.3 underwent endoscopy. For the 45 cases assessing management intensity, overall concordance was 89% (p < 0.001): 90% of cases with DSI ≤ 18.3 had reduced follow-up, and 89% with DSI > 18.3 had intensified management. The cohort exhibited broad functional heterogeneity not captured by standard labs or elastography. Conclusions: HepQuant DuO’s DSI cutpoint 18.3 demonstrated strong concordance with real-world clinical decisions, supporting its utility for risk stratification, optimizing endoscopy use, and tailoring management in cACLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whitaker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: