Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AbstractAbstractTheoretical consideration of the formation of plowzone archaeological deposits implicates artifact size as an important and heretofore under-used source of information. Modality in size distributions of degradable artifacts, such as low-fired pottery and bone, indicates the addition of stratigraphically deeper materials to a plowzone assemblage. This means that different ages and/or depositional contexts are mixed in such assemblages. With sufficiently large and well-controlled samples, the location and characterization of subplowzone deposits may be possible from the analysis of size distributions of surface materials alone. Application to a "worst case" surface assemblage from SE Missouri demonstrates the general feasibility of the approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dunnell et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: