Key result
The Automated aRTifacts handling in EEG (ARTE) algorithm increased driver sleepiness classification accuracy by 5% as a preprocessing step, compared to a 2% increase with the FORCe algorithm.
Why the study?
Does the ARTE algorithm improve EEG artifact handling and driver sleepiness classification accuracy compared to FORCe in drivers?
Does the ARTE algorithm improve EEG artifact handling and driver sleepiness classification accuracy compared to FORCe in drivers?
The ARTE algorithm provides a data-driven approach to EEG artifact handling that improves driver sleepiness classification accuracy without relying on reference signals or manual thresholds.
ARTE may enhance EEG-based driver sleepiness detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Automated analyses of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals acquired in naturalistic environments are becoming increasingly important in areas such as brain-computer interfaces and behavior science. However, the recorded EEG in such environments is often heavily contaminated by motion artifacts and eye movements. This poses new requirements on artifact handling. The objective of this paper is to present an automated EEG artifacts handling algorithm, which will be used as a preprocessing step in a driver monitoring application. The algorithm, named Automated aRTifacts handling in EEG (ARTE), is based on wavelets, independent component analysis, and hierarchical clustering. The algorithm is tested on a dataset obtained from a driver sleepiness study including 30 drivers and 540 30-min 30-channel EEG recordings. The algorithm is evaluated by a clinical neurophysiologist, by quantitative criteria (signal quality index, mean square error, relative error, and mean absolute error), and by demonstrating its usefulness as a preprocessing step in driver monitoring, here exemplified with driver sleepiness classification. All results are compared with a state-of-the-art algorithm called FORCe. The quantitative and expert evaluation results show that the two algorithms are comparable, and that both algorithms significantly reduce the impact of artifacts in recorded EEG signals. When artifact handling is used as a preprocessing step in driver sleepiness classification, the classification accuracy increased by 5% when using ARTE and by 2% when using FORCe. The advantage with ARTE is that it is data driven and does not rely on additional reference signals or manually defined thresholds, making it well suited for use in dynamic settings where unforeseen and rare artifacts are commonly encountered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barua et al. (2017) studied Driver sleepiness (n=30). Automated aRTifacts handling in EEG (ARTE) algorithm vs. FORCe algorithm was evaluated on Increase in driver sleepiness classification accuracy. The Automated aRTifacts handling in EEG (ARTE) algorithm increased driver sleepiness classification accuracy by 5% as a preprocessing step, compared to a 2% increase with the FORCe algorithm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: