Key result
Poor glycemic control in acute PE is linked to ~14% higher plasma TAFI levels.
Why the study?
Diabetes is associated with pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic states, but the role of glycemic control in pulmonary embolism is poorly understood.
Does diabetes or glycemic control affect the levels of pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic biomarkers in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=205)
Yes
Does diabetes or glycemic control affect the levels of pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic biomarkers in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism?
Thrombo-inflammatory biomarkers are elevated in acute PE regardless of diabetes status, though poor glycemic control in diabetics is associated with higher TAFI levels and more severe PE.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating in diabetic PE; leaves open whether optimizing glycemic control alters thromboembolic risk or outcomes.
Type I and type II diabetes are closely associated with a pro-inflammatory state and to a pro-thrombotic state. The role of glycemic control in pulmonary embolism (PE) is poorly understood and requires additional investigation. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between glycemic control and thrombo-inflammatory biomarkers in a PE patient cohort compared to normal samples. Demographic and clinical information for 86 diabetic patients and 106 non-diabetic patients presenting with acute PE was collected via retrospective chart review. Plasma levels of pro-inflammatory (C-reactive protein [CRP], tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and pro-thrombotic (d-dimer, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1], tissue plasminogen activator [tPA], thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor [TAFI], von-Willebrand factor [vWF], endogenous glycosaminoglycans [GAGs]) biomarkers were drawn within 24 hours of diagnosis of acute PE. Data was also obtained for a population of healthy adult controls. All the pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic biomarkers were elevated in diabetic PE patients in comparison to healthy controls. None of the biomarkers were elevated in diabetic PE patients when compared to non-diabetic PE patients. There was no difference in the levels of the pro-inflammatory biomarkers according to glycemic control. The plasma level of TAFI was elevated in diabetic patients with poor glycemic control. Diabetic patients were more likely to have a more severe PE. These studies demonstrate that thrombo-inflammatory biomarkers are elevated in diabetic PE patients with associated comorbidities in comparison to normal individuals. However, there is no difference between the PE cohort alone in comparison to PE with diabetes. The role of TAFI within the continuum of diabetic vascular disease warrants additional investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Hara et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute Pulmonary Embolism (n=205). Poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) vs. Adequate glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) was evaluated on Plasma level of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFIa) (%) (p=<0.01). Poor glycemic control in diabetic patients with acute pulmonary embolism was associated with significantly elevated plasma levels of TAFI (104.27% vs 91.46%) compared to adequate glycemic control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: