This study adopts Complex Network Theory in the context of bus transit network. The study aims at quantifying the topological characteristics and assessing the validity of static-robustness metrics as expressive measures of transit networks robustness. In addition, dynamic-robustness indices, that consider transit operational profile, are utilized to measure the cascading impacts of disruptive events. The analysis is based on a dataset of 40 bus transit networks. The results indicate that bus networks don't conform to any major network class: scale-free, small-world, or random. Furthermore, the static-robustness metrics produced contradictory results, which raises valid concerns on their applicability. The dynamic-robustness indices developed in the current study indicated significant cascading impacts resulting from node removal relative to the removal of links. This behaviour was further examined through a two-step cluster analysis, which resulted in three distinct network clusters: small node-sensitive; small link-sensitive; and medium less-sensitive networks. These findings are directed to inform a robustness-based design of bus transit networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelaty et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: