Key result
Wavefront mapping links type III AF drivers to more ablation for termination vs type I.
Why the study?
Localized persistent AF drivers are controversial because they fluctuate and ablation may not terminate AF, prompting investigation into whether concurrent drivers interact to produce fluctuating areas of control.
Does wavefront field mapping identify interacting AF drivers that explain ablation termination patterns in persistent AF?
Observational (n=54)
Reviewers blinded to outcome for phase mapping
Yes
Does wavefront field mapping identify interacting AF drivers that explain ablation termination patterns in persistent AF?
Wavefront field mapping reveals that persistent AF is driven by a small number of interacting rotational and focal sites, and the area of atrial control may determine the success of targeted ablation.
May stratify ablation needs by AF driver pattern; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending trials.
BACKGROUND: Localized drivers are proposed mechanisms for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) from optical mapping of human atria and clinical studies of AF, yet are controversial because drivers fluctuate and ablating them may not terminate AF. We used wavefront field mapping to test the hypothesis that AF drivers, if concurrent, may interact to produce fluctuating areas of control to explain their appearance/disappearance and acute impact of ablation. METHODS: We recruited 54 patients from an international registry in whom persistent AF terminated by targeted ablation. Unipolar AF electrograms were analyzed from 64-pole baskets to reconstruct activation times, map propagation vectors each 20 ms, and create nonproprietary phase maps. RESULTS: Each patient (63.6±8.5 years, 29.6% women) showed 4.0±2.1 spatially anchored rotational or focal sites in AF in 3 patterns. First, a single (type I; n=7) or, second, paired chiral-antichiral (type II; n=5) rotational drivers controlled most of the atrial area. Ablation of 1 to 2 large drivers terminated all cases of types I or II AF. Third, interaction of 3 to 5 drivers (type III; n=42) with changing areas of control. Targeted ablation at driver centers terminated AF and required more ablation in types III versus I (P=0.02 in left atrium). CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront field mapping of persistent AF reveals a pathophysiologic network of a small number of spatially anchored rotational and focal sites, which interact, fluctuate, and control varying areas. Future work should define whether AF drivers that control larger atrial areas are attractive targets for ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leef et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=54). Wavefront field mapping of AF drivers was evaluated on Amount of ablation required to terminate AF in type III versus type I patterns (p=0.02). Wavefront field mapping identified 3 types of AF driver patterns, with type III requiring significantly more ablation to terminate AF compared to type I (P=0.02 in left atrium).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: