Uncovers immune cell-specific genes influencing Parkinson's disease, suggesting novel therapeutic targets.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder with growing evidence suggests peripheral immunity plays a role in its pathogenesis. However, the specific peripheral immune cell types and gene expression profiles associated with PD remain unclear. In this study, we integrated single-cell expression quantitative trait loci (sc-eQTL) data from 14 immune cell types in the OneK1K cohort with large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for PD. Using Mendelian randomization (MR) and Bayesian colocalization analyses, we identified 28 immune-cell-specific eGenes with significant associations to PD risk, among which 24 showed strong or moderate evidence of shared genetic signals. Notable candidates included FDFT1, ARSA, CTSB, and HLA-DQA1, each displaying cell-type-specific associations in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Replication using an independent sc-eQTL dataset from the DICE project confirmed consistent findings for several eGenes. Additional validation through peripheral blood single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) revealed distinct expression patterns and significant changes in PD patients. Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) showed multiple associations with immune-related traits and minimal associations with unrelated traits, indicating a favorable safety profile for therapeutic targeting. Drug repurposing analysis identified several candidate compounds, including felodipine, amodiaquine, alprazolam, and tetrandrine, some of which are predicted to cross the blood-brain barrier. Molecular docking simulations further supported strong binding interactions between these compounds and PD-associated targets such as CTSB and ARSA. This integrative approach highlights key immune-cell-specific genes involved in PD and proposes several repurposable drugs with central nervous system potential, paving the way for more targeted therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: