Key result
Myosin-5a varies stride length across ~22 to 34 actin subunits to accommodate helical disorder in F-actin.
Why the study?
It remained unclear how molecular motors like myosin-5 navigate cellular environments and potential track disorder, despite optical studies suggesting uniform steps along F-actin tracks.
Demonstrates that molecular motors and their tracks are soft materials that adapt to structural disorder, challenging the canonical uniform stepping model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Challenges uniform myosin-5a stepping model; hypothesis-generating for motor adaptation in cardiac actin tracks.
Molecular motors employ chemical energy to generate unidirectional mechanical output against a track. By contrast to the majority of macroscopic machines, they need to navigate a chaotic cellular environment, potential disorder in the track and Brownian motion. Nevertheless, decades of nanometer-precise optical studies suggest that myosin-5a, one of the prototypical molecular motors, takes uniform steps spanning 13 subunits (36 nm) along its F-actin track. Here, we use high-resolution interferometric scattering (iSCAT) microscopy to reveal that myosin takes strides spanning 22 to 34 actin subunits, despite walking straight along the helical actin filament. We show that cumulative angular disorder in F-actin accounts for the observed proportion of each stride length, akin to crossing a river on variably-spaced stepping stones. Electron microscopy revealed the structure of the stepping molecule. Our results indicate that both motor and track are soft materials that can adapt to function in complex cellular conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fineberg et al. (2023) studied Basic science (molecular motors) (n=96). Myosin-5a stepping on F-actin was evaluated on Stride length distribution. Myosin-5a takes strides spanning 22 to 34 actin subunits, varying its step length to accommodate cumulative angular disorder in F-actin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: