Why the study?
Does speckle-tracking echocardiography characterize left ventricular deformation and torsion in patients with ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis, and does diflunisal improve myocardial function?
Does speckle-tracking echocardiography characterize left ventricular deformation and torsion in patients with ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis, and does diflunisal improve myocardial function?
Speckle-tracking echocardiography reveals progressive impairment in longitudinal and basal LV radial function in ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis, while diflunisal treatment may improve apical rotation and torsion at 1 year.
May indicate diflunisal benefit on LV torsion in ATTRm; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Mutated transthyretin-associated (ATTRm) amyloidosis with heart failure is associated with decreased longitudinal left ventricular (LV) myocardial contraction, as measured by strain Doppler echocardiography. We sought to clarify whether speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) would provide useful information in patients with ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients with ATTRm amyloidosis were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 had no evidence of cardiac involvement (n = 47), group 2 had heart involvement but no congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels < 100 pg/mL (n = 35), and group 3 had heart involvement and CHF and/or serum BNP levels ≥ 100 pg/mL (n = 41). All patients underwent standard 2-dimensional (2D), Doppler echo, and STE. RESULTS: < 0.0001). Radial strain also showed significant intergroup differences for each basal LV segment. Among 41 patients who could have been followed up after 1 year, 34 patients with diflunisal treatment had shown improvement in apical rotation and torsion without deterioration in multidirectional strains. CONCLUSION: ATTRm cardiac amyloidosis is characterized by progressive impairment in longitudinal and basal LV radial function when global circumferential shortening and torsion remain unchanged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koyama et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: