Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
3D RRAM arrays are studied at the device- and architecture-levels. The memory cell performance for a horizontal cross-point is shown experimentally to be essentially comparable to vertical pillar-around geometry. Array performances (read/write, energy, and speed) of different 3D architectures are investigated by SPICE simulation, showing horizontal stacked RRAM is superior but suffers from higher bit cost. Adopting a bi-layer pillar electrode structure is demonstrated to enlarge the array size in 3D vertical RRAM. Design guidelines are proposed for the 3D VRRAM: it shows that increasing the number of stacks of VRRAM while keeping the total bits the same, as well as scaling of feature size (F), are critical for reducing RC delay and energy consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: