OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and causes of drug-induced jaundice in a rural community. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 800 patients presenting to a single-centre jaundice referral system serving a community of 400 000 over a period of 66 months (1998-2004). Standard criteria for drug-induced liver injury were applied to patients with a putative diagnosis of drug-induced jaundice. The incidence rates per prescription of drug-induced jaundice caused by co-amoxiclav and flucloxacillin were derived from local and national annual prescription rates. RESULTS: The incidence of drug-induced jaundice was 1.27 (confidence limits 0.85-1.8) per 100 000 per annum in a total of 28 patients (17 men, mean age 69 years). Antibiotics were the commonest cause of jaundice (n=21). Of these, co-amoxiclav (n=9) and flucloxacillin (n=7) caused the majority with an incidence rate per 100 000 prescriptions of 9.91 (4.6-18.0) and 3.60 (1.5-7.2), respectively. Co-amoxiclav-induced jaundice was observed more commonly in elderly males (age 65 years, M : F 7 : 2). In those patients with flucloxacillin or co-amoxiclav-induced jaundice, bilirubin ranged from 54 to 599 mumol/l (267 mumol/l) with a resolution of jaundice between 30 and 90 days. Counselling with regard to potential drug-induced liver injury and reporting of the adverse reaction had been performed in 1/28 patients. CONCLUSIONS: 8.1% patients with no biliary obstruction and jaundice had a drug-induced and predominantly antibiotic-related aetiology particularly affecting an elderly population. We recommend that all patients receiving co-amoxiclav and flucloxacillin should be counselled before the therapy regarding the potential risk of jaundice and that an alternative antibiotic to co-amoxiclav is used if possible in men over the age of 60 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussaini et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: