This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Proponents of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality have argued for somewhat different conceptualizations of the factors. Ultimately, the factors are best understood by a specification of the traits (or facets) that define them, and these facets in turn must be clearly conceptualized. Using as examples the Conscientiousness facet scales of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, we discuss six approaches to understanding facet-level traits: (i) rational analysis of item content; (ii) characterization of the low pole, the psychological opposite; (iii) interpretation of external correlates; (iv) examination of secondary and tertiary factor loadings; (v) translation into the specialized languages of applied psychology; and (vi) case studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: