Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research Article| March 22, 2017 PRISM Software: Processing and Review Interface for Strong‐Motion Data Jeanne Jones; Jeanne Jones aWestern Geographic Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 531, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.jmjones@usgs.govpng@usgs.gov Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Erol Kalkan; Erol Kalkan bEarthquake Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.ekalkan@usgs.govcdstephens@usgs.gov Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Christopher Stephens; Christopher Stephens bEarthquake Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.ekalkan@usgs.govcdstephens@usgs.gov Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Peter Ng Peter Ng aWestern Geographic Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 531, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.jmjones@usgs.govpng@usgs.gov Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jeanne Jones aWestern Geographic Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 531, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.jmjones@usgs.govpng@usgs.gov Erol Kalkan bEarthquake Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.ekalkan@usgs.govcdstephens@usgs.gov Christopher Stephens bEarthquake Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.ekalkan@usgs.govcdstephens@usgs.gov Peter Ng aWestern Geographic Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 531, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A.jmjones@usgs.govpng@usgs.gov Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 13 Jul 2017 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2017) 88 (3): 851–866. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160200 Article history First Online: 13 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jeanne Jones, Erol Kalkan, Christopher Stephens, Peter Ng; PRISM Software: Processing and Review Interface for Strong‐Motion Data. Seismological Research Letters 2017;; 88 (3): 851–866. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160200 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search ABSTRACT A continually increasing number of high‐quality digital strong‐motion records from stations of the National Strong Motion Project (NSMP) of the U.S. Geological Survey, as well as data from regional seismic networks within the United States, calls for automated processing of strong‐motion records with human review limited to selected significant or flagged records. The NSMP has developed the Processing and Review Interface for Strong Motion data (PRISM) software to meet this need. In combination with the Advanced National Seismic System Quake Monitoring System (AQMS), PRISM automates the processing of strong‐motion records. When used without AQMS, PRISM provides batch‐processing capabilities. The PRISM software is platform independent (coded in Java), open source, and does not depend on any closed‐source or proprietary software. The software consists of two major components: a record processing engine composed of modules for each processing step, and a review tool, which is a graphical user interface for manual review, edit, and processing. To facilitate use by non‐NSMP earthquake engineers and scientists, PRISM (both its processing engine and review tool) is easy to install and run as a stand‐alone system on common operating systems such as Linux, OS X, and Windows. PRISM was designed to be flexible and extensible to accommodate implementation of new processing techniques. All the computing features have been thoroughly tested. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: