For the one-sided hypothesis testing problem it is shown that it is possible to reconcile Bayesian evidence against H 0, expressed in terms of the posterior probability that H 0 is true, with frequentist evidence against H 0, expressed in terms of the p value. In fact, for many classes of prior distributions it is shown that the infimum of the Bayesian posterior probability of H 0 is equal to the p value; in other cases the infimum is less than the p value. The results are in contrast to recent work of Berger and Sellke (1987) in the two-sided (point null) case, where it was found that the p value is much smaller than the Bayesian infimum. Some comments on the point null problem are also given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casella et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: