Why the study?
Do non-antiarrhythmic medications prevent or improve the management of atrial fibrillation when used as an adjunct to standard therapy?
Do non-antiarrhythmic medications prevent or improve the management of atrial fibrillation when used as an adjunct to standard therapy?
This review highlights the potential role of non-antiarrhythmic medications as adjuvant therapy in the prevention and management of atrial fibrillation.
Hypothesis-generating for non-antiarrhythmic AF adjuncts; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, with increasing prevalence in the aging US population and affecting more than 2.3 million people. Current approaches for managing AF are rate- or rhythm-control strategies, both using anti-thrombotic therapy to prevent thromboembolism. While great advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of AF, few new strategies have shown promise in prevention or treatment of AF. Recent data suggest that non-antiarrhythmic medication may be useful in modifying the substrate that allows AF precipitation and perpetuation. This article reviews the data on the role of these agents in the prevention and management of AF as an adjunct to standard therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: