Key result
The joint application of notch filtering and Wavelet denoising improved the signed correlation index by 4 to 15% compared to conventional notch filtering in atrial fibrillation electrograms.
Why the study?
Conventional notch filtering removes powerline interference from intra-atrial electrograms but adds artificial fractionation that conceals accurate interpretation, leaving effective artifact suppression an unresolved challenge.
Does joint notch filtering and Wavelet denoising improve powerline interference removal in atrial fibrillation electrograms compared to notch filtering alone?
Does joint notch filtering and Wavelet denoising improve powerline interference removal in atrial fibrillation electrograms compared to notch filtering alone?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The joint application of notch filtering and Wavelet denoising efficiently reduces powerline interference while preserving the original morphology of atrial fibrillation electrograms.
Analysis of intra-atrial electrograms (EGMs) nowadays constitutes the most common way to gain new insights about the mechanisms triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these recordings are highly contaminated by powerline interference (PLI) due to the large amount of electrical devices operating simultaneously in the electrophysiology laboratory. To remove this perturbation, conventional notch filtering has been widely used. However, this method adds artificial fractionation to the EGMs, thus concealing their accurate interpretation. Hence, the development of novel algorithms for PLI suppression in EGMs is still an unresolved challenge. Within this context, the present work introduces the joint application of common notch filtering and Wavelet denoising for enhanced PLI removal in AF EGMs. The algorithm was validated on a set of 100 unipolar EGM signals, which were synthesized with different noise levels. Original and denoised EGMs were compared in terms of a signed correlation index (SCI), computed both in time and frequency domains. Compared with the single use of notch filtering, improvements between 4 and 15% were reached with Wavelet denoising in both domains. As a consequence, the proposed algorithm was able to efficiently reduce high levels of PLI and simultaneously preserve the original morphology of AF EGMs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2018) studied Atrial Fibrillation (n=100). Joint notch filtering and Wavelet denoising vs. Conventional notch filtering was evaluated on Signed correlation index (SCI) in time and frequency domains. The joint application of notch filtering and Wavelet denoising improved the signed correlation index by 4 to 15% compared to conventional notch filtering in atrial fibrillation electrograms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: