Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new equation to estimate muscle mass in males was developed using parameters common to the 1981 Canada Fitness Survey and the male cadaver data of Martin et al. (1990b). The cadavers (N = 12) were randomly divided into two groups. The equation was developed on cadaver Group A and then validated on Group B. Once the equation with the most suitable variables was validated on Group B, it was redeveloped on combined data from Groups A and B. The final equation is as follows: muscle mass (gm) = Ht (0.031MUThG2 + 0.064CCG2 + 0.089CAG2) - 3,006; adjusted R2 = .96, SEE = 1,488 gm, F = 87.5, p = .0001. Variables (in cm) were Ht, height; MUThG, modified upper thigh girth; CCG, corrected calf girth; and CAG, corrected arm girth. The predictive ability of this equation was comparable to the original equation of Martin et al. (1990b) and can be a valuable tool for muscle mass estimation of male subjects in the 1981 Canada Fitness Survey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doupe et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: