Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
• Argues that, despite critiques of culture-history, the use of diagnostic material traits to understand cultural identities and associated places remains prominent within archaeological methods. • Considers how ethnographic subjects often self-identify using categorical identity labels and associated material signifiers. • Demonstrates how perception of ethno-regional identity informed the government’s 1947 Partition resettlement planning in Delhi, India, using maps, floor plans, and archival records. • Provides images and ethnographic description of individual households that illustrate how community perceptions of post-migration identity were impacted by refugee sociopolitical positionality and marginalization. • Uses this case study to argue for the foregrounding of sociopolitical positionality in archaeologies of migration, which must involve discussion of the identity politics associated with place, belonging, and legitimacy. Archaeologists understand the limitations of viewing cultural categories as deterministic of material culture use and preference. Nonetheless, it is challenging to avoid such assumptions when attempting to interpret material patterns associated with moments of migration. This paper considers how regional identities shaped the ways refugees interacted with resettlement housing landscapes in Delhi (India) following the 1947 Partition of South Asia. Collating information from in-site survey, oral history interviews, and documentary records, I argue that refugees often view their prePartition regional identities as a major orienting factor in how they have interacted with urban landscapes in the city. Punjabi refugees self-describe their resettlement spaces as modern and quick-changing. Bengali refugees highlight the green space and festival grounds in their communities. Refugees from the North West Frontier Provence highlight their resilience in the face of coercive government planning. All view foregrounding such identities as means to counter the negative stereotypes associated with the broader identifier “refugee.” This case study highlights how individuals can themselves contribute to dominant narratives about the determinism of cultural identities and associated material signifiers.
Erin P. Riggs (Fri,) studied this question.