Fitting models to incomplete categorical data requires more care than fitting models to the complete data counterparts, not only in the setting of missing data that are non-randomly missing, but even in the familiar missing at random setting. Various aspects of this point of view have been considered in the literature. We review it using data from a multi-centre trial on the relief of psychiatric symptoms. First, it is shown how the usual expected information matrix (referred to as naive information) is biased even under a missing at random mechanism. Second, issues that arise under non-random missingness assumptions are illustrated. It is argued that at least some of these problems can be avoided using contextual information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molenberghs et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: