PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 28, 2016Current Opinion in Biotechnology12 citationsOpen Access

What computational non-targeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics can gain from shotgun proteomics

HHHamid HamzeiyJCJürgen Cox

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

• Improvement of mass accuracies will aid metabolomics workflows. • MaxQuant allows ppb mass accuracies to be calculated. • Elemental composition can be inferred for more metabolite features. • Implementation is on-going and shows promising first results. Computational workflows for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics and untargeted metabolomics share many steps. Despite the similarities, untargeted metabolomics is lagging behind in terms of reliable fully automated quantitative data analysis. We argue that metabolomics will strongly benefit from the adaptation of successful automated proteomics workflows to metabolomics. MaxQuant is a popular platform for proteomics data analysis and is widely considered to be superior in achieving high precursor mass accuracies through advanced nonlinear recalibration, usually leading to five to ten-fold better accuracy in complex LC–MS/MS runs. This translates to a sharp decrease in the number of peptide candidates per measured feature, thereby strongly improving the coverage of identified peptides. We argue that similar strategies can be applied to untargeted metabolomics, leading to equivalent improvements in metabolite identification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamzeiy et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d915c33e2df9c962fb844https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper