Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Antidepressant medications are the cornerstone of depression treatment worldwide, playing a central role in reducing the burden of depressive disorders. Their appropriate use is particularly important in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the prevalence of mental health conditions is high and health systems face increasing demand. Despite the clinical importance of antidepressants, limited evidence exists on how psychiatrists in LMICs prescribe these medications. Jordan, a middle-income country with a growing mental health burden, provides a valuable case study for understanding prescribing patterns and identifying areas for improvement. Objectives: This study examined (1) the knowledge, attitudes, and prescribing practices of Jordanian psychiatrists regarding antidepressant medications, and (2) the perceived challenges hindering optimal prescribing. Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitatively, a cross-sectional survey was administered to licensed psychiatrists in Jordan (n = 108; response rate 79.4%). The instrument was adapted from previously published tools on psychotropic prescribing practices and refined using international guidelines and recent reviews on antidepressant use. Qualitatively, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of four psychiatrists to explore systemic, clinical, and contextual barriers to antidepressant prescribing. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analyses, while interview transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis. Results: Although psychiatrists demonstrated a reasonable understanding of antidepressant pharmacology, important gaps were evident. Only one-third (34.3%) recognized Ministry of Health (MOH) guidelines, while nearly four in ten (37.4%) felt international guidelines did not fully apply to Jordan’s population. Laboratory monitoring for metabolic side effects was inconsistently applied, with just 17.6% always requesting such tests and 11.1% never doing so. Consultation with internal medicine for patients on multiple medications was not routine, reported as “sometimes” by 69.4% of psychiatrists. Attitudes toward prescribing reflected caution, particularly in managing pregnant or lactating women, where only half (51.0%) supported discontinuation and three-quarters (75.9%) preferred dose or drug adjustment. Early-career psychiatrists showed lower engagement, as knowledge and attitude scores were significantly higher among those with 11–20 years of experience compared to those with ≤10 years (p < 0.001). Overall, the findings highlight uneven application of evidence-based practices, reliance on personal clinical judgment, and limited engagement with national standards. Conclusions: Although safety and patient outcomes are valued, systemic, clinician, and patient-related barriers constrain optimal practice. Strengthening national guideline dissemination, ensuring medication access, and supporting continuing professional development could improve prescribing practices in Jordan and similar LMIC contexts.
Abdulhaq et al. (Tue,) studied this question.