Despite long‐held concerns about the effects of researchers on breeding birds, few studies have focused on the impact of investigators on Procellariiformes. In this review, we summarise published investigations concerning the effects of investigators on physiology, behaviour, reproductive success, offspring quality, and population trends of procellariiform seabirds. Many of the smaller procel‐lariid taxa, such as storm‐petrels (Hydrobatidae, and some shearwater Puffinus species) are particularly sensitive to handling during the incubation period, resulting in lowered reproductive success, burrow shifts, and increased divorce between pairs. However, repeated handling of chicks does not seem to have a discernible effect on chick quality. In larger procellariiforms, the presence of researchers within the breeding colony is associated with significant increases in heart rates. Therefore, researchers seeking unbiased estimates of demographic and ecological parameters of birds should be encouraged to measure their own impact and report the findings in the literature, even if they detect no adverse effects of investigator disturbance. Techniques should be developed that ensure the accurate recording of birds’ natural behaviour while minimising the impact of investigator disturbance. If investigators are willing to study disturbance problem s, it should be possible to reduce biases caused by their activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark J. Carey (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: