Key result
Using an artificial lung model, whole-body plethysmography was shown to overestimate tidal volume due to the conditioning of inspired air and the active force driving expiration.
Why the study?
Despite frequent use of whole-body plethysmography in animal disease models, debate remains regarding what exactly is measured and how reliable the data are.
This study clarifies the physiological components measured by whole-body plethysmography in small animals, showing that the Penh parameter is not a direct measure of airway resistance.
Caution urged interpreting plethysmography-derived volumes in rodent models; leaves open validity of Penh for resistance assessment pending in vivo confirmation.
Whole-body plethysmography (WBP) is an established method to determine physiological parameters and pathophysiological alteration of breathing in animals and animal models of a variety of diseases. Although frequently used, there is ongoing debate about what exactly is measured by whole-body-plethysmography and how reliable the data derived from this method are. Here, we designed an artificial lung model that enables a thorough evaluation of different predictions about and around whole-body plethysmography. Using our lung model, we confirmed that during WBP two components contribute to the pressure changes detected in the chamber: (1) the increase in the pressure due to heating and moistening of the air during inspiration, termed conditioning; (2) changes in the chamber pressure that depend on airway resistance. Both components overlap and contribute to the temporal pressure-profile measured in the chamber or across the wall of the chamber, respectively. Our data showed that a precise measurement of the breathing volume appears to be hindered by at least two factors: (1) the unknown relative contribution of each of these two components; (2) not only the air in the inspired volume is conditioned during inspiration, but also air within the residual volume and dead space that is recruited during inspiration. Moreover, our data suggest that the expiratory negative pressure peak that is used to determine the enhanced pause (Penh) parameter is not a measure for airway resistance as such but rather a consequence of the animal's response to the airway resistance, using forced or active expiration to overcome the resistance by a higher thoracic pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hülsmann et al. (2021) studied this question. Artificial lung model was evaluated on Tidal volume measurement accuracy. Using an artificial lung model, whole-body plethysmography was shown to overestimate tidal volume due to the conditioning of inspired air and the active force driving expiration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: