Key result
Young normotensive African-American men demonstrated significantly lower spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity compared to Caucasian men (10.35 vs 13.36 ms/mmHg, p=0.03).
Why the study?
African-American men face a greater risk of hypertension than Caucasian men, but differences in underlying mechanisms such as spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity and their relationships with cardiorespiratory fitness and arterial stiffness require clarification.
Are there differences in spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity between young, normotensive African-American men and Caucasian men?
Cross-Sectional (n=59)
No
Are there differences in spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity between young, normotensive African-American men and Caucasian men?
Young normotensive African-American men have significantly lower spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity compared to Caucasian men, which is not explained by cardiorespiratory fitness or arterial stiffness.
May indicate early autonomic differences in young normotensive African-American men; leaves open longitudinal cardiovascular risk implications.
Purpose: African-American men (AAM) have a greater risk of hypertension (HTN) than Caucasian men (CM). To reduce this risk, determining the differences in mechanisms involved in HTN and understanding the relationship between these mechanisms and factors affecting blood pressure (BP) in AAM and CM is necessary. One such mechanism is spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (sBRS) and two factors are cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and arterial stiffness (AS). The aims of this study were to determine, firstly, whether there are differences in sBRS between young, normotensive AAM and CM, and secondly, to determine if CRF and AS are significant predictors of sBRS in young, normotensive AAM and CM. Methods: Twenty-three normotensive AAM and 36 CM were recruited from Southern Connecticut State University. Measures included anthropometric, sBRS (alpha-index), and CRF (maximal oxygen consumption [VO2max]), as well as AS (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [Cf-PWV]). Independent t-tests were used to determine differences between groups and multiple regression analysis was used to determine how much of the variation in sBRS was explained by CRF and AS. Results: The sBRS was significantly lower in AAM (10.3 ± 3.8 ms/mmHg) vs. CM (13.3 ± 5.7 ms/ mmHg), P = 0.03. CRF and AS were not significant predictors of sBRS in AAM (P = 0.25) and CM (P = 0.30). There was no relationship between, sBRS, CRF and AS; CRF was significantly reduced in AAM vs. CM (45.1 ± 6.3 vs. 52.1 ± 7.5 mL·kg−1·min−1, P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Young normotensive AAM demonstrated significantly lower sBRS vs. CM, irrespective of having fair CRF and normal BP. CRF and AS are not significant predictors of sBRS in young, normotensive AAM and CM. The attenuation in sBRS in AAM did not result in AAM having higher BP versus CM. This finding underscores the need for more detailed examination of the role of sBRS in the etiology of HTN in AAM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latchman et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (Normotensive) (n=59). African-American ethnicity vs. Caucasian ethnicity was evaluated on Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (alpha-index in ms/mmHg) (p=0.03). Young normotensive African-American men demonstrated significantly lower spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity compared to Caucasian men (10.35 vs 13.36 ms/mmHg, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: