We compare passive microwave (PM)-derived sea ice concentrations (SIC) with more than 21 600 ship-based observations (OBS) of SIC acquired around Antarctica. PM SIC are derived from SSM/I-SSMIS and AMSR-E measurements in 1991-2009 and 2002-2010, respectively, with the ARTIST Sea Ice (ASI), Comiso Bootstrap (BST), NASA-Team (NT), enhanced NASA-Team (NT2), and EUMETSAT OSI-SAF (OSI) algorithm. We compare correlation coefficients (CC), RMSDs, and biases, separately for SSM/I-SSMIS data for algorithms ASI, BST, OSI, and NT, and for AMSR-E data for algorithms ASI, BST, and NT2. With OBS SIC and PM SIC being on fundamentally different spatiotemporal scales, we develop a new colocation approach using daily-average along-ship-track SIC values. CC between OBS SIC and PM SIC agree within their uncertainty for all algorithms and sensors. Year-round CC values are around 0.85 (AMSR-E) and 0.82 (SSM/I); CC values are similar during summer, but drop significantly during winter. Year-round RMSD values range from 13% (BST and OSI) to 17% (NT) for SSM/I and from 12% (BST) to 16% (NT2) for AMSR-E. RMSD values are similar during summer, but decrease for winter (BST: 8% for AMSR-E, 10% for SSM/I). For AMSR-E, biases are below 0.5% for BST and ASI, but between 5% (winter) and 9% (summer) for NT2. For SSM/I, biases are smaller during summer, -0.7% for BST to -7.8% for NT, than winter, -3.6% for BST to -13.9% for NT. Overall, best agreement between OBS and PM SIC is found for BST.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beitsch et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: