OBJECTIVES: Identification of tumor-specific somatic mutations has had a significant impact on both disease diagnosis and therapy selection. The ability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to provide a quantitative assessment of mutant allele burden, in numerous target genes in a single assay, provides a significant advantage over conventional qualitative genotyping platforms. METHODS: We assessed the quantitative capability of NGS and a primer extension-based matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (PE-MALDI) assay and directly correlated NGS mutant allele burden determination to morphologic assessment of tumor percentage in H&E-stained slides. RESULTS: Our results show a 100% concordance between NGS and PE-MALDI in mutant allele detection and a significant correlation between NGS and PE-MALDI for determining mutant allele burden when mutant allele burden is 10% or more. CONCLUSIONS: NGS-based mutation screening provides a quantitative assessment comparable to that of PE-MALDI. In addition, NGS also allows for a high degree of multiplexing and uses nanogram quantities of DNA, thereby preserving precious material for future analysis. Furthermore, this study provides evidence that H&E-based morphologic assessment of tumor burden does not correlate to actual tumor mutant allele burden frequency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Portier et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: