Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduce a simple financially constrained production framework in which heterogeneous firms and banks maintain multiple credit connections. The parameters of credit market interaction are estimated from real data in order to reproduce a set of empirical regularities of the Japanese credit market. We then pursue the metamodeling approach, i.e. we derive a reduced form for a set of simulated moments \\(h(\θ ,s)\\) through the following steps: (1) we run agent-based simulations using an efficient sampling design of the parameter space \\(\Θ \\); (2) we employ the simulated data to estimate and then compare a number of alternative statistical metamodels. Then, using the best fitting metamodels, we study through sensitivity analysis the effects on h of variations in the components of \\(\θ \∈ \Θ \\). Finally, we employ the same approach to calibrate our agent-based model (ABM) with Japanese data. Notwithstanding the fact that our simple model is rejected by the evidence, we show th at metamodels can provide a methodologically robust answer to the question “does the ABM replicate empirical data?”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bargigli et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: