Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the role of co-benefits - positive effects of climate change mitigation projects in addition to CO2 reduction - in motivating individuals to donate to such projects. In two artefactual field experiments conducted with large population samples (n = 2400 in total), we test how the existence and specific nature of co-benefits affect donations. In both experiments, we find that co-benefits have a positive impact on participants' willingness to donate. Moreover, our second experiment shows that contributions respond to the nature of co-benefits, and these responses seem to be driven by individuals' preferences for specific types of co-benefits. We further observe that co-benefits also increase donations when making carbon footprints and thus individual responsibility for environmental externalities more salient. In sum, our study provides a comprehensive picture of the potential of co-benefits for increasing donations to climate change mitigation projects and has several implications for the provision of co-benefits information in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feldhaus et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: