A basic methodology for the classification of land cover using airborne multispectral scanner (MSS) imagery is outlined. This methodology includes the four stages of: waveband selection and radiometric calibration; correction for scan angle and atmosphere; training and classification and accuracy assessment. Three possible refinements were: (1) the use of a per‐field sampling scheme; (2) the inclusion of texture in the classifier and (3) the use of two dates of imagery. Ten land covers were classified using: the basic methodology; the basic methodology with refinement 1; the basic methodology with refinements 1 and 2 and the basic methodology with refinements 1, 2 and 3. The overall levels of accuracy (Kappa index) were 65%, 82%, 85% and 87% respectively. The basic methodology and refinements 1 and 2 were shown to be suitable for land cover classification. Given the extra costs involved, the case for two dates of airborne MSS data is not a strong one and further research using optimised data sets is required before its relative utility can be evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curran et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: