Key result
In children under 2 years old undergoing surgery in the prone position, there was no significant correlation between pleth variability index and pulse pressure variation (correlation coefficient -0.131, p=0.350).
Why the study?
Assessing intravascular volume status is critical during anesthesia in children, prompting a comparison between pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index in young children undergoing surgery in the prone position.
Is there a significant correlation between pulse pressure variation (PPV) and pleth variability index (PVI) in pediatric patients under 2 years old undergoing surgery in the prone position?
Observational (n=27)
No
Is there a significant correlation between pulse pressure variation (PPV) and pleth variability index (PVI) in pediatric patients under 2 years old undergoing surgery in the prone position?
Effect estimate: Bias -2.2% (95% CI -18.8 to 14.5)
p-value: p=0.350
In children under 2 years old undergoing surgery in the prone position, PVI and PPV do not significantly correlate, indicating they cannot be used interchangeably for hemodynamic monitoring in this population.
PVI may not substitute for PPV in prone-position pediatric surgery; observational data leave open questions about their hemodynamic utility.
BACKGROUND: The assessment of intravascular volume status is very important especially in children during anesthesia. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and pleth variability index (PVI) are well known parameters for assessing intravascular volume status and fluid responsiveness. We compared PPV and PVI for children aged less than two years who underwent surgery in the prone position. METHODS: A total of 27 children were enrolled. We measured PPV and PVI at the same limb during surgery before and after changing the patients' position from supine to prone. We then compared PPV and PVI at each period using Bland-Altman plot for bias between the two parameters and for any correlation. We also examined the difference between before and after the position change for each parameter, along with peak inspiratory pressure, heart rate and mean blood pressure. RESULTS: The bias between PPV and PVI was -2.2% with a 95% limits of agreement of -18.8% to 14.5%, not showing significant correlation at any period. Both PPV and PVI showed no significant difference before and after the position change. CONCLUSIONS: No significant correlation between PVI and PPV was observed in children undergoing surgery in the prone position. Further studies relating PVI, PPV, and fluid responsiveness via adequate cardiac output estimation in children aged less than 2 years are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgery in the prone position (n=27). Pleth variability index (PVI) vs. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was evaluated on Bias and correlation between PPV and PVI (Bias -2.2%, 95% CI -18.8 to 14.5, p=0.350). In children under 2 years old undergoing surgery in the prone position, there was no significant correlation between pleth variability index and pulse pressure variation (correlation coefficient -0.131, p=0.350).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: