Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper aims to distinguish Wittgenstein’s concept of ‘form of life’ from other concepts or expressions that have been confused or conflated with it, such as ‘language-game’, ‘certainty’, ‘patterns of life’, ‘ways of living’ and ‘facts of living’. Competing interpretations of Wittgenstein’s ‘form(s) of life’ are reviewed (Baker with, where the human is concerned, a single human form of life characterized by innumerable forms of human life.
Danièle Moyal‐Sharrock (Tue,) studied this question.