This article examines relationships between immigration farm employment poverty and welfare use in 65 towns and cities with populations ranging from 1000 to 20000 in 1990 in the major agricultural areas of California. It tests the hypothesis that expanding labor-intensive agriculture creates a negative externality by drawing large numbers of workers from Mexico offering many of them poverty-level earnings and increasing public assistance use in rural towns. Econometric findings reveal a circular relationship between farm employment and immigration. An additional 100 farm jobs are associated with 136 more immigrants 139 more poor residents and 79 more people receiving welfare benefits in rural towns. An additional 100 immigrants in turn are associated with 37 more farm jobs. Most of the impact of farm employment on poverty is indirect through immigration. (EXCERPT) (SUMMARY IN FRE AND SPA)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: