Why the study?
To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of creatine phosphate sodium in the treatment of viral myocarditis, providing guidance for clinical treatment.
Does creatine phosphate sodium improve the effective rate of treatment in patients with viral myocarditis?
Does creatine phosphate sodium improve the effective rate of treatment in patients with viral myocarditis?
Creatine phosphate sodium as an adjunctive therapy significantly improves clinical efficacy and reduces myocardial injury markers in patients with viral myocarditis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adjunctive creatine phosphate sodium in viral myocarditis; extends meta-analytic confirmation of efficacy without added risk.
PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of creatine phosphate sodium in the treatment of viral myocarditis, and to provide guidance for its clinical treatment. METHODS: We conducted a search of The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, and Web of Science databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of creatine phosphate sodium (CPS) in the treatment of viral myocarditis. The search was conducted up to April 2024. After screening the literature, extracting data, and evaluating the risk of bias in the included studies, we performed a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 and Stata17.0 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 104 articles were retrieved, and 9 articles with a combined total of 1,116 patients were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that the overall efficacy rate in the phosphocreatine sodium treatment group was higher than that in the control group [RR = 1.22, 95%CI (1.15, 1.28), P<0.00001]. Furthermore, post-treatment levels of cardiac troponin I [MD = 0.1, 95%CI (0.07, 0.13), P<0.00001] and creatine kinase isoenzyme [MD = 9.43, 95%CI (7.04,11 .82), P<0 .00001] in the phosphocreatine treatment group were lower compared to those in the control group; both differences between groups were statistically significant. Additionally, there was no significant difference observed in adverse reaction incidence between the phosphocreatine sodium treatment group and conventional treatment group [RR = 1 .07, 95% CI (0 .68, 1 .67), P = O .77]. CONCLUSION: Creatine phosphate sodium treatment can significantly improve the therapeutic effect of patients with viral myocarditis, and can reduce the levels of cTnI and CK-MB. Compared with conventional treatment, it has good safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: