We studied the relation between vividness of imagery and four aspects of creativity, fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. We studied too the difference in creativity of high and low imagers. We obtained for 122 children (69 boys and 53 girls) significant, but low correlations, between imagery vividness and creativity for girls (fluency = .30, flexibility = .32, originality = .24, elaboration = .33) and in the total group (fluency = .24, flexibility = .23, originality = .14, elaboration = .21), but not for boys (fluency = .13, flexibility = .09, originality = .02, elaboration = .11). Differences between high ( n = 35) and low ( n = 45) imagers in creativity were significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campos et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: