Sustainable decision making addresses resource and cost sharing among current and future generations. Adaptation costs are incurred by current and damage mitigation costs are borne by future generations. Circularity extends sustainability by including resource regeneration and benefits from resource re-use. Climate change and associated global warming are producing more frequent extreme events with different probabilities of occurrence than historically observed. Traditional approaches to asset and infrastructure design tend to be backward-looking for weather- and climate-related bases and to introduce too little variability to compensate for uncertainty, resulting in infrastructure that was designed for irrelevant future conditions. An example dynamic probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for flood inundation is developed and implemented to examine the usefulness and limitations of PRA for sustainable water resource management. It specifically addresses the issue of sustainable decision making related to outdated but historically regulatory-compliant assets under non-stationary climatic conditions. Weather attribution provides improved extreme event frequency expectations to, generates the dynamic component of, and allows for incorporation of additional uncertainty to the PRA. Results from the PRA provide decision making optimization between current adaptation and future mitigation costs. A limitation of PRA is that it analyzes failure and risk and not benefits accruing from resource regeneration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: