Conclusions: The association between geo- graphical area and cervical cancer persists after controlling for 10 other factors. The results are consistent with a multiple infectious aetiology of cervical cancer and suggest that there may be additional risk factors associated with geo- graphical characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziébland et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: