Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unsupervised stimulus-stimulus redundancy compression, one component of Gluck and Myers’s (1993) representational theory of the hippocampal-region function, could emerge from the anatomy and physiology of the entorhinal cortex. This hypothesis is suggested by a physiologically and anatomically realistic model of the entorhinal cortex derived from a similar model of the olfactory cortex previously proposed by Ambros-Ingerson, Granger, and Lynch (1990). To the extent that entorhinal function can survive damage strictly limited to the hippocampal formation (the H lesion), this has implications for interpreting the behavioral consequences of lesions which either do or do not spare overlying cortical areas. In particular, we expect that the H lesion should not interrupt stimulus-stimulus redundancy compression, thereby sparing conditioning behaviors, such as latent inhibition, which are eliminated by broader (H++) lesions to the hippocampal region. However, such other behaviors as the context sensitivity of latent inhibition and of learned responses are expected to be affected by the H lesion. These predictions are consistent with empirical data. The theory also leads to several novel predictions for behavioral comparisons of intact, H-lesioned, and H++-lesioned animals on tasks such as sensory preconditioning, compound preconditioning, and easy-hard transfer. A major theme of this paper is to illustrate how a bottom-up model of cortical processing can be integrated with a top-down model of hippocampal-region function to yield a more complete mapping from physiology to behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myers et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: