Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For conventional metallic samples, agreement between experimental damage thresholds and three theoretical thresholds—for melting m, vaporizing ν, and heating to 2 eV—is fair (factor of ∼ 2 to ∼ 10). The previous scaling Itp∼tp1/2/A is valid in general, but It∼tp1/2 is valid for (I tp)m, (I tp)ν, and (I tp)2eV individually. Silver has the greatest theoretical threshold and figure of merit at 1.06 μm, but silver, copper, and gold have approximately equal figures of merit at 10.6 μm. Some clustering mechanism probably is involved in the isolated-spot damage observed in conventional samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sparks et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: