Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fog computing provides new ideas for solving big data problems in the Internet of Things (IoT) era. With fog, we can save much time on long-distance transmission, thereby increasing the efficiency of network service. However, to transform fog computing from a technology to a service, we first need to properly handle the trading relationship between users and service provider in fog. In this paper, we design an efficiency-aware dynamic service pricing strategy to optimize the payoffs of both users and provider in fog computing. In the modeling, we design a Stackelberg competition-based model while regarding provider as the market leader, and each individual user as a follower. Users in this model care about how to obtain the most cost-effective services. And provider pays attention to taking full advantage of the geo-distributed characteristic in setting prices with multiple customers. In the performance evaluation part, we carry out experiments using real-world datasets to simulate this continuous negotiation process between supply and demand in fog pricing. The results show that our strategy can solve the dual-objective optimization problem while establishing a stable trading relationship between the two sides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: