Why the study?
The study investigated the dynamics of patient-provider communication in the cardiac rehabilitation referral process to identify which aspects lead to participation.
Does patient-provider communication regarding referral to cardiac rehabilitation improve cardiac rehabilitation participation in patients eligible for CR?
Does patient-provider communication regarding referral to cardiac rehabilitation improve cardiac rehabilitation participation in patients eligible for CR?
Facilitating the logistical enrollment process for cardiac rehabilitation is more influential for patient participation than the strength of the provider's verbal referral.
HCP facilitation of CR enrollment may outweigh referral strength in driving attendance; hypothesis-generating for communication interventions and should not yet change practice.
This study investigated the dynamics of patient-provider communication in the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral process, to identify which aspects lead to CR participation. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 31 patients eligible for CR. Questions probed the content and perception of the discussion that patients had with healthcare providers (HCP) regarding CR attendance. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and imported into N6 software for grounded analyses. Key emerging themes were identified: illness perceptions; HCP encouragement; timing of discussion; and ease of referral. CR attenders were apt to self-advocate to ensure their enrollment in CR, whereas nonattenders were more likely to minimize the seriousness of their disease, and less likely to persevere to overcome obstacles in enrolling in a CR program. Surprisingly, the strength of the HCP referral did not influence the decision to attend CR as strongly when compared to the HCP’s ability to facilitate enrollment in a CR program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitoff et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: