Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The expansion of touch-sensitive technologies, ranging from smartwatches to wall screens, triggered a wider use of gesture-based user interfaces and encouraged researchers to invent recognizers that are fast and accurate for end-users while being simple enough for practitioners. Since the pioneering work on two-dimensional (2D) stroke gesture recognition based on feature extraction and classification, numerous approaches and techniques have been introduced to classify uni- and multi-stroke gestures, satisfying various properties of articulation-, rotation-, scale-, and translation-invariance. As the domain abounds in different recognizers, it becomes difficult for the practitioner to choose the right recognizer, depending on the application and for the researcher to understand the state-of-the-art. To address these needs, a targeted literature review identified 16 significant 2D stroke gesture recognizers that were submitted to a descriptive analysis discussing their algorithm, performance, and properties, and a comparative analysis discussing their similarities and differences. Finally, some opportunities for expanding 2D stroke gesture recognition are drawn from these analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magrofuoco et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: