Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk is distributed unequally between ethnic groups, but the extent to which this is attributable to ethnic differences in general and abdominal obesity remains uncertain.
Does the contribution of general and abdominal obesity to high metabolic cardiovascular risk vary among different ethnic groups?
Does the contribution of general and abdominal obesity to high metabolic cardiovascular risk vary among different ethnic groups?
Abdominal obesity is a major contributor to high metabolic cardiovascular risk, with its impact varying substantially across different ethnic groups, helping to explain ethnic disparities in cardiovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ethnicity-specific abdominal obesity screening in minorities; leaves causal impact and intervention effects open for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: The burden of cardiovascular risk is distributed unequally between ethnic groups. It is uncertain to what extent this is attributable to ethnic differences in general and abdominal obesity. Therefore, we studied the contribution of general and abdominal obesity to metabolic cardiovascular risk among different ethnic groups. METHODS: We used data of 21 411 participants of Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African-Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish or Moroccan origin in Healthy Life in an Urban Setting (Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Obesity was defined using body-mass-index (general) or waist-to-height-ratio (abdominal). High metabolic risk was defined as having at least two of the following: triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/l, fasting glucose ≥5.6 mmol/l, blood pressure ≥130 mmHg systolic and/or ≥85 mmHg diastolic and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <1.03 mmol/l (men) or <1.29 mmol/l (women). RESULTS: Among ethnic minority men, age-adjusted prevalence rates of high metabolic risk ranged from 32 to 59% vs. 33% among Dutch men. Contributions of general obesity to high metabolic risk ranged from 7.1 to 17.8%, vs. 10.1% among Dutch men, whereas contributions of abdominal obesity ranged from 52.1 to 92.3%, vs. 53.9% among Dutch men. Among ethnic minority women, age-adjusted prevalence rates of high metabolic risk ranged from 24 to 35% vs. 12% among Dutch women. Contributions of general obesity ranged from 14.6 to 41.8%, vs. 20% among Dutch women, whereas contributions of abdominal obesity ranged from 68.0 to 92.8%, vs. 72.1% among Dutch women. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, especially abdominal obesity, contributes significantly to the prevalence of high metabolic cardiovascular risk. Results suggest that this contribution varies substantially between ethnic groups, which helps explain ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perini et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: