This paper demonstrates coupled time-domain computational-fluid-dynamics (CFD) and computationalstructural-dynamics simulations for flutter analysis of a real aircraft in the transonic regime. It is shown that a major consideration for a certain class of structural models is the transformation method, which is used to pass information between the fluid and structural grids. The aircraft used for the calculations is the BAE Systems Hawk. A structural model, which has been developed by BAE Systems for simplified linear flutter calculations, only has a requirement for O(10) degrees of freedom. There is a significant mismatch between this and the surface grid on which loads and deflections are defined in the CFD calculation. This paper extends the constant volume tetrahedron tranformation, previously demonstrated for wing-only aeroelastic calculations, to multicomponent, or full aircraft, cases and demonstrates this for the Hawk. A comparison is made with the predictions of a linear flutter code.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woodgate et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: