PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2000Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition592 citations

The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access.

View Full Paper
ACAlbert CostaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsACAlfonso CaramazzaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreNSNúria Sebastián‐GallésUniversitat Pompeu Fabra

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Do nonselected lexical nodes activate their phonological information? Catalan-Spanish bilinguals were asked to name (a) pictures whose names are cognates in the 2 languages (words that are phonologically similar in the 2 languages) and (b) pictures whose names are noncognates in the 2 languages. If nonselected lexical nodes are phonologically encoded, naming latencies should be shorter for cognate words, and because the cognate status of words is only meaningful for bilingual speakers, this difference should disappear when testing monolingual speakers. The results of Experiment 1 fully supported these predictions. In Experiment 2, the difference between cognate and noncognate words was larger when naming in the nondominant language than when naming in the dominant language. The results of the 2 experiments are interpreted as providing support to cascaded activation models of lexical access.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Costa et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e5c697f6e8bbb2368d030https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper