Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares machine learning algorithms predicting textile effluent treatment efficiency, suggesting optimal methods exist.
The prediction of pollutants removal efficiency from the generated effluent of a treatment plant is valuable and can reduce the time, sampling and energy required during performance assessment. The present study aims to predict the effect of different input parameters on the treatment efficiency of the developed microbial‐based anaerobic process for textile effluent using machine leaning algorithms. The decolourisation and chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction of the treated effluent were predicted on the basis of the three different input parameters pH, COD and colour value of the textile wastewater. The effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms, support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), gradient boost regressor (GBR), AdaBoost, extreme gradient boosting (XGB) regressor and voting regressor, were evaluated based on the correlation coefficient ( R 2 ) value. The results revealed that the RF achieved the highest accuracy for decolourisation (training data R 2 : ∼0.85 and test data R 2 : ∼0.84) as well as COD reduction (training data R 2 : ∼0.87 and test data R 2 : ∼0.94) compared to the other algorithms. These results were validated experimentally, confirming that RF can be used as a tool to predict the performance efficiency of a microbial‐based treatment system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuchiwal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: